A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours over the construction of the wall at a coastal web page in the north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted countrywide consideration following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, Based on sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times, a picture which has due to the fact come to be emblematic of your depth in the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence from the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 men entered the h2o throughout severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times create a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already completed based on Skilled tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.